At Some Point The BBC Will Have To Choose

August 30th, 2010

istock_hares2The Japanese have a saying that “you cannot chase two hares”. What this means to business leaders is that organisations with conflicting objectives are not sustainable. At some point you must make a choice or watch your company wither on the corporate vine.

The BBC, for example, is stuck between its twin objectives of (1) meeting specific public service commitments (covering areas such as education, creativity, and citizenship), and (2) achieving national reach and remaining relevant to the nation (i.e. able to attract large audiences).

Modern TV is essentially about entertainment, which is why programmes like the X Factor and Coronation Street top the ratings. There’s nothing wrong with that, but pure entertainment is not part of the BBC’s public service objective.

Sure, there are times when great public service broadcasting also delivers big audiences, but these are the exceptions rather than the rule. As a result, the BBC is forced to include pure entertainment programmes with little or no public service element to them, particularly at peak viewing times. Last Saturday night’s schedule, for example, included these programmes:

  • A game-show, where people have to jump 50 feet into a pool if they get a question wrong;
  • A light entertainment show, where members of the public get a chance to sing with celebrities;
  • A lottery draw;
  • Two stand-up comedy programmes; and
  • Two football highlight programmes.

Not one of these programmes could be said to be pure public service broadcasting, and could just easily be delivered by one of the many other commercial channels now available. Indeed, the media choices that consumers now have ­– alternative commercial channels, specialist channels, internet TV, cable and satellite broadcasting – make a ratings objective and a general programming remit increasingly difficult to sustain.

The time is coming, therefore, when the BBC executives and governors will have to make a choice. Either they must focus the organisation on entertainment and ratings, in which case it should forego its public and government funding, or pursue its public service objectives more single-mindedly, in which case the nature of its programming should be radically changed and its pursuit of ratings drastically reduced.

The BBC’s management will fight making these choices but at some point they must choose. If they fail to make a clear choice the corporation will continue to fall short of both of its objectives, and the pressure on it will increase. There is simply no escape from this reality.

The consequences of either choice are enormous, but at some point they must be faced into. As with any other organisation or business, it is generally better to make the choice early and then determinedly and creatively pursue it, than it is to defer the painful, but inevitable D-Day.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

New! Fast-Lane Innovation Booklet

August 13th, 2010

Fast-Lane Innovation.indd

I am delighted to announce the publication of my new booklet, Fast-Lane Innovation: How To Accelerate Growth And Leave The Competition Behind.

This 43-page booklet helps business leaders make innovation a way of life. It provides insights, case studies and models to help CEO’s and their teams lead innovation, source new innovation ideas and build innovative organisations. The booklet includes sections on the top 5 innovation killers, how to get over your fear of failure, how to steal new ideas with integrity, and how to build a simple innovation process, and has 15 powerful lessons and 45 actions for you take away.

Fast-Lane Innovation is the second in my series of strategy guides for business leaders. The first booklet, The CEO’s Strategy Handbook, is still available, and, as announced on Wednesday, will be turned into a 250-page book for publication by Global Professional Publishing in 2011.

For more details, to download the free PDF version or to buy the hard copy of either/both books, simply click here.

Enjoy!

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Announcing Stuart’s New Book

August 11th, 2010

I’m delighted to let you know that I’ve entered into a publishing agreement with Global Professional Publishers to create a provocative, practical, pragmatic and priceless book on creating and delivering high-value business strategies!

Our working title is The CEO’s Strategy Handbook: How To Lead, Develop and Deliver High-Value Strategies! It will be the go-to book for CEOs and business leaders who want provocative insights and pragmatic advice to setting strategy and turning winning strategies into great results.

Over the next few months, I will keep you up-to-date with progress, give you exclusive extracts and - of course - let you know how you can buy it!

I’m very excited about this. Very. Excited. Now all I have to do is write it…

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

There Are Only 10 Ways To Grow Profits

August 10th, 2010

Despite the innumerable books, articles, videos consultancy services, and management courses on the subject, there are still only 10 ways.

Which of the 10 are most likely to deliver profitable growth for your business? The answer to that question will have significant implications for your strategic priorities, key programmes of work and organisational focus.

10-ways-to-grow-profits

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

The Trouble With Quick Wins

August 10th, 2010

Is that they usually aren’t. There are three reasons:

  1. Their impact is too small to register on any performance scale as a ‘win’. This means that the project is never at the top of anyone’s list of priorities and is never fully delivered.
  2. They consume more effort than you originally estimate. The lack of progress means that you have to spend more time managing your project and communicating with and influencing your reluctant stakeholders.
  3. They prevent you from getting on with more important projects. This is the biggest reason of all. As Apple boss, Steve Jobs, once said, “It’s only by saying no that you can concentrate on the things that are really important.”

So what should you do instead? The simple answer is to get on with the important stuff. If something is valuable, but difficult, that is all the more reason to do it.

Quick Wins are only justified when they are an intrinsic part of delivering a Big Win. By all means celebrate your early, small victories that form critical early steps towards a major business improvement, but don’t get sucked into the vortex of project madness where you end up pursuing quick wins for the sake of it.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Innovation - Steal don’t imitate

August 3rd, 2010

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

The Opposite Of Customer Service

August 3rd, 2010

Is Customer Hindrance, and is defined as a company’s ability to make it harder, more expensive and less rewarding for their customers to do business with them.

Perhaps surprisingly, many companies still think that this is the way to go in driving profits and growth. In the last 72 hours, for example, I’ve come across these three examples of ‘excellence’ in customer hindrance:

  1. The Post Office. I wanted to send 100 ‘large letters’ first class. The cost per letter was 96 pence, and so I asked for 100 of these stamps. “Oh sorry,” said ‘Cashier Number 2’, “they don’t make 96 pence stamps. You can either get a 90p, 5p and a 1p or buy some 97 pence stamps.” Thinking of the health of my tongue, I paid the £97 and quickly left. But how can Royal Mail impose a standard charge of 96p without a stamp to back it up?
  2. LloydsTSB. There was a queue of about 5 people in the bank yesterday. Luckily there were three cashiers and so I expected that I would be seen pretty quickly. What I hadn’t realised was that two of the three cashiers were in place, not to serve customers, but to mindlessly tap away on over-sized calculators and ignore and frustrate the people who want to do business with them. Perhaps I should have known better. After all, this is the same bank that still hasn’t processed the credit card application I completed in December last year - even though I kindly filled out a second form in February!
  3. Sports Direct. Yes, I know, what do I expect from a low price, bargain-bin store? Well, foolishly my wife had hoped for a tiny bit of common sense and an ability of the store manager to ‘do the right thing’. My son spent his £10 Sports Direct voucher on a new football (he only had 10 already, poor thing), but two days later it was flat due to a faulty valve. My wife took it back, knowing that if the goods were defective the receipt, which she’d mislaid, was not required. The store manager refused to accept any responsibility, repeatedly reciting this mantra, “Our policy says, our policy says, our policy says….”

Delivering stand-out customer service is not so hard when the competition has such low standards. It simply requires that you remove the hindrances that make it harder for your potential customers to do business with you. Unfortunately, this is an approach that the Post Office, LloydsTSB and Sports Direct have yet to master.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Corporate Partnerships: For Better Or Worse?

July 29th, 2010

growth-partnershipsjpgOver the past 10-20 years a new golden rule of business has emerged: you can’t succeed on your own. Rapidly changing technologies and the globalisation of most markets are the two biggest factors that lead CEOs to conclude that they need to work with others and share the effort, investment and risk of developing and pursuing major new opportunities.

Even once bitter rivals can seemingly put their animosity to one side if there is a sufficient prize available. A few years ago, for example, Peugeot, Citroen and Fiat came together to develop their MPV range. Fiat called it the Ullysee, Citroen the C8 and Peugeot the 807, but it was fundamentally the same car.

Using the chart above, the carmakers’ partnership was a growth partnership. By working together, the companies were more cost-effectively able to develop a new product, in line with their strategy, than they could by going it alone.

There are three other types of possible partnership, however.

Where there is both longer-term strategic fit and immediate cost synergies, game-changing partnerships are possible. Many of these partnerships take the form of mergers and acquisitions, but that needn’t necessarily be the case. For example, over the past 20 years P&G and Wal-Mart have been able to accelerate growth and reduce costs for both sides by partnering on supply management, product development and category management.

Back-office partnerships take place when cost synergies exist, but there is not the level of strategic fit. Companies such as Capita, Carillion and IBM are all focused on delivering support activities to corporations, using their specialist skills and scale to release cost and resource.

Of course, not all partnerships deliver what they promise. Either the strategic fit was an illusion, as the executives from Daimler Benz and Chrysler found out after their merger in 1998, or the expected cost synergies failed to materialise, as Sainsbury’s discovered after they made a huge bet in the 1990s on using IT to dramatically lower costs, asked Accenture to make it happen, and then watched in horror as they failed to make any real headway.

These partnerships are distractions, and in the cases of Daimler, Chrysler, Sainsbury’s and Accenture they were distractions that consumed enormous amount of time from the most senior people in the organisation, involved legions of managers and staff, and cost billions of dollars. Distractions end in tears, literally.

If you are looking to enter into a partnership with another business, you must therefore take the following steps:

  1. Understand the limits of the prize available and understand the nature of the partnership. If it’s about accessing new customers, don’t expect cost reductions, and, equally, if it is about lower cost operations don’t expect to be able to miraculously leap into new markets.
  2. In your mind, at least, reduce the size of the prize you’ve discussed by half and double the effort and cost to get there. Only if it still looks highly attractive should you think about proceeding.
  3. Establish clear and unambiguous criteria for success and set in place milestones where either party can back out if performance is below agreed levels. It is inconvenient to clear up a small mess; it is a career-killer to be clearing up major, avoidable catastrophes.

All this means that you must be willing to put the effort up-front with your prospective partner to build trust at different levels in the organisations, and have the difficult conversations about how you will manage the relationship in the months and years ahead.

Partnerships can be a highly effective way to accelerate the growth and performance of your business. But, if they are not managed in focused way, they can also be a great way in bring your company to its knees.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

The Two Critical Strategy Questions: Can You Answer Them?

July 12th, 2010

Qn 1: Where are you going to play?

Qn 2: How are you going to win?

The first question requires you to define the world in which you will participate – your target customers, the products and services you will offer them, the channels you will offer them through and your geographical reach.

The second question asks you to articulate how you will be #1 in your chosen world – what you will be famous for, how you will gain an edge over the competition and which capabilities you need to succeed.

Three critical things to remember:

  1. Your world does not have to be the world. It could be the UK, or the North West, or Manchester, or even Eccles. And you don’t need to focus on everyone. You can target women, or women under 30, or women under 30 with a family. Well, you get the picture – have you defined the world in which you wish to play? And if you have, how attractive is it?
  2. You do have to be #1 in your chosen world. Only market leaders succeed and generate adequate returns and growth. You have no choice but to be #1, so do you have the capabilities and points of uniqueness that your customers value? And can you deliver them in a way that allows you to generate adequate profits?
  3. The two questions are inter-linked. As you answer these questions it becomes clear that you need to answer both at once. Your chosen market helps define the types of competitive advantage you need, and your capabilities help determine the markets in which you can succeed. It is an iterative process.

Only when you have crisp, focused replies to these two questions are you likely to have a strategy that has a chance of being delivered by your organisation.

Worryingly, many executives struggle to come up with a clear response, although, unsurprisingly, they tend to lead organisations that are struggling to succeed.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks

Focus your innovation on what won’t change

July 6th, 2010

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks