Archive for the ‘Strategy’ Category

At Some Point The BBC Will Have To Choose

Monday, August 30th, 2010

istock_hares2The Japanese have a saying that “you cannot chase two hares”. What this means to business leaders is that organisations with conflicting objectives are not sustainable. At some point you must make a choice or watch your company wither on the corporate vine.

The BBC, for example, is stuck between its twin objectives of (1) meeting specific public service commitments (covering areas such as education, creativity, and citizenship), and (2) achieving national reach and remaining relevant to the nation (i.e. able to attract large audiences).

Modern TV is essentially about entertainment, which is why programmes like the X Factor and Coronation Street top the ratings. There’s nothing wrong with that, but pure entertainment is not part of the BBC’s public service objective.

Sure, there are times when great public service broadcasting also delivers big audiences, but these are the exceptions rather than the rule. As a result, the BBC is forced to include pure entertainment programmes with little or no public service element to them, particularly at peak viewing times. Last Saturday night’s schedule, for example, included these programmes:

  • A game-show, where people have to jump 50 feet into a pool if they get a question wrong;
  • A light entertainment show, where members of the public get a chance to sing with celebrities;
  • A lottery draw;
  • Two stand-up comedy programmes; and
  • Two football highlight programmes.

Not one of these programmes could be said to be pure public service broadcasting, and could just easily be delivered by one of the many other commercial channels now available. Indeed, the media choices that consumers now have ­– alternative commercial channels, specialist channels, internet TV, cable and satellite broadcasting – make a ratings objective and a general programming remit increasingly difficult to sustain.

The time is coming, therefore, when the BBC executives and governors will have to make a choice. Either they must focus the organisation on entertainment and ratings, in which case it should forego its public and government funding, or pursue its public service objectives more single-mindedly, in which case the nature of its programming should be radically changed and its pursuit of ratings drastically reduced.

The BBC’s management will fight making these choices but at some point they must choose. If they fail to make a clear choice the corporation will continue to fall short of both of its objectives, and the pressure on it will increase. There is simply no escape from this reality.

The consequences of either choice are enormous, but at some point they must be faced into. As with any other organisation or business, it is generally better to make the choice early and then determinedly and creatively pursue it, than it is to defer the painful, but inevitable D-Day.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

There Are Only 10 Ways To Grow Profits

Tuesday, August 10th, 2010

Despite the innumerable books, articles, videos consultancy services, and management courses on the subject, there are still only 10 ways.

Which of the 10 are most likely to deliver profitable growth for your business? The answer to that question will have significant implications for your strategic priorities, key programmes of work and organisational focus.

10-ways-to-grow-profits

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Corporate Partnerships: For Better Or Worse?

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

growth-partnershipsjpgOver the past 10-20 years a new golden rule of business has emerged: you can’t succeed on your own. Rapidly changing technologies and the globalisation of most markets are the two biggest factors that lead CEOs to conclude that they need to work with others and share the effort, investment and risk of developing and pursuing major new opportunities.

Even once bitter rivals can seemingly put their animosity to one side if there is a sufficient prize available. A few years ago, for example, Peugeot, Citroen and Fiat came together to develop their MPV range. Fiat called it the Ullysee, Citroen the C8 and Peugeot the 807, but it was fundamentally the same car.

Using the chart above, the carmakers’ partnership was a growth partnership. By working together, the companies were more cost-effectively able to develop a new product, in line with their strategy, than they could by going it alone.

There are three other types of possible partnership, however.

Where there is both longer-term strategic fit and immediate cost synergies, game-changing partnerships are possible. Many of these partnerships take the form of mergers and acquisitions, but that needn’t necessarily be the case. For example, over the past 20 years P&G and Wal-Mart have been able to accelerate growth and reduce costs for both sides by partnering on supply management, product development and category management.

Back-office partnerships take place when cost synergies exist, but there is not the level of strategic fit. Companies such as Capita, Carillion and IBM are all focused on delivering support activities to corporations, using their specialist skills and scale to release cost and resource.

Of course, not all partnerships deliver what they promise. Either the strategic fit was an illusion, as the executives from Daimler Benz and Chrysler found out after their merger in 1998, or the expected cost synergies failed to materialise, as Sainsbury’s discovered after they made a huge bet in the 1990s on using IT to dramatically lower costs, asked Accenture to make it happen, and then watched in horror as they failed to make any real headway.

These partnerships are distractions, and in the cases of Daimler, Chrysler, Sainsbury’s and Accenture they were distractions that consumed enormous amount of time from the most senior people in the organisation, involved legions of managers and staff, and cost billions of dollars. Distractions end in tears, literally.

If you are looking to enter into a partnership with another business, you must therefore take the following steps:

  1. Understand the limits of the prize available and understand the nature of the partnership. If it’s about accessing new customers, don’t expect cost reductions, and, equally, if it is about lower cost operations don’t expect to be able to miraculously leap into new markets.
  2. In your mind, at least, reduce the size of the prize you’ve discussed by half and double the effort and cost to get there. Only if it still looks highly attractive should you think about proceeding.
  3. Establish clear and unambiguous criteria for success and set in place milestones where either party can back out if performance is below agreed levels. It is inconvenient to clear up a small mess; it is a career-killer to be clearing up major, avoidable catastrophes.

All this means that you must be willing to put the effort up-front with your prospective partner to build trust at different levels in the organisations, and have the difficult conversations about how you will manage the relationship in the months and years ahead.

Partnerships can be a highly effective way to accelerate the growth and performance of your business. But, if they are not managed in focused way, they can also be a great way in bring your company to its knees.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

The Two Critical Strategy Questions: Can You Answer Them?

Monday, July 12th, 2010

Qn 1: Where are you going to play?

Qn 2: How are you going to win?

The first question requires you to define the world in which you will participate – your target customers, the products and services you will offer them, the channels you will offer them through and your geographical reach.

The second question asks you to articulate how you will be #1 in your chosen world – what you will be famous for, how you will gain an edge over the competition and which capabilities you need to succeed.

Three critical things to remember:

  1. Your world does not have to be the world. It could be the UK, or the North West, or Manchester, or even Eccles. And you don’t need to focus on everyone. You can target women, or women under 30, or women under 30 with a family. Well, you get the picture – have you defined the world in which you wish to play? And if you have, how attractive is it?
  2. You do have to be #1 in your chosen world. Only market leaders succeed and generate adequate returns and growth. You have no choice but to be #1, so do you have the capabilities and points of uniqueness that your customers value? And can you deliver them in a way that allows you to generate adequate profits?
  3. The two questions are inter-linked. As you answer these questions it becomes clear that you need to answer both at once. Your chosen market helps define the types of competitive advantage you need, and your capabilities help determine the markets in which you can succeed. It is an iterative process.

Only when you have crisp, focused replies to these two questions are you likely to have a strategy that has a chance of being delivered by your organisation.

Worryingly, many executives struggle to come up with a clear response, although, unsurprisingly, they tend to lead organisations that are struggling to succeed.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Growth: It Is What You Do (Not Just The Way That You Do It)

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

istock_strategymapThe old song may say that ‘it ain’t what you do, it’s the way that you do it’, but, when it comes to your strategy for growth, nothing could be further from the truth.

There are two sets of decisions in any strategy development process. The first set is to decide where you wish to play, which is called participation strategy. This focuses on the customers you wish to serve, the product and service markets you wish to serve them with, the channels you will sell through and the geographical markets where you will operate.

The second set is all about how you intend to win, or your competitive strategy. These decisions are all about what you wish to be famous for – the best products/services, the cheapest offer, the most convenient service, the best advice or the ability to deliver bespoke solutions.

Success, of course, happens when you are able to bring these two elements of strategy together in a way that (1) your customers value, and (2) your competitors struggle to emulate.

I have found, however, that many executives and managers are resolutely focused on competitive strategy, often at the expense of participation strategy.

Take Apple, for example. Its success over the past ten years has been regularly hailed as a tribute to the company’s ability to innovate and build the best products. That’s true, but Apple has always had those skills and that competitive edge.

The real breakthrough for Apple came when Steve Jobs moved the company out of the relatively narrow market of personal computers and into a much bigger playing field of personal electronic devices. That’s the decision that allowed iTunes, the iPod and the iPhone to be developed in the first place.

Over the past twelve months I have helped several clients drive major new growth initiatives and, in all cases, the real breakthrough came when we focused on their participation strategy.

For example, I helped one retailer, looking to accelerate its growth, identify and enter an attractive and adjacent new market for it to add to its existing ranges. The management team were aware of this market, but because their focus had been on competitive elements of their strategy (such as the level of in-store service they should offer), they hadn’t given this opportunity the attention it deserved.

The other valuable aspect of critically reviewing your participation strategy is that you can drive growth by deciding not to do something. I recently helped a consumer goods business to exit a declining and unprofitable channel, and re-invest the cost savings in higher growth channels, resulting in valuable new growth without adding a penny to the company’s overall operating costs.

It is necessary to make sure that you remain competitive and are advantaged against your competitors. But you should not neglect the huge opportunity for growth by critically reviewing your participation strategy.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Are You An Integrated Innovator?

Wednesday, June 16th, 2010

Strategic advances are made when organisations become the first to find a profitable way to exploit new opportunities. These opportunities may be created by changes in customer tastes, technology, economics or other external factors, or, more likely, a combination of different factors.

Strategic advances are not made through problem solving. Resolving problems is about dealing with the past, not the future. Problem solving may help you drive performance – or at least return it to previous levels – but it will not dramatically improve your strategic position.

It is innovation that drives profit growth. Successive reports and studies – see here, for example – confirm that companies that lead on metrics such as return on capital and sales growth are those that are best able to drive innovation.

problem-solving-vs-innovationYet many businesses, and their leaders, remain focused on problem solving ahead of innovation. Of course, you need a mix of both, but the key issue is where your real focus is.

Using the chart, there are four quadrants for you to consider. If you were to divide all your time and focus, what share would you attach to each quadrant?

In my experience, 70% or more of the attention of most chief executives is devoted to problem solving, and up to 50% of it is on ‘fire fighting’, resolving issues as they arise. If you wish to gain a stronger position in your market you must devote a bigger share of your time and effort to systematic innovation efforts; you must become an ‘integrated innovator’.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Client Success Story: Creating High-Growth Strategies For The Bristan Group

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

bristan-logo

I have recently been working with the executive team from the Bristan Group, the UK’s largest supplier of bathroom and kitchen taps, showers, shower enclosures, decorative heating and bathroom accessories, helping them to develop new growth strategies for the business.

Here is a summary of what we’ve achieved.

Client Challenge:

  • New CEO, Jeremy Ling, reorganised the Bristan Group (itself a wholly-owned subsidiary of Masco Corporation in the US), establishing four trading divisions
  • Jeremy, together with Lance Gillett (CFO) asked Morgan Cross Consulting to lead and facilitate the development of compelling growth strategies and plans for each of the divisions

Our Role:

  • Create a robust and pragmatic process for each of the divisions to use in developing their strategies
  • Facilitate key strategy off-sites involving over 30 of the Group’s top executives
  • Establish high levels of commitment, enthusiasm and passion to the delivery of these strategies from each of the four leadership teams
  • Develop the strategy development capabilities of the divisional executive teams

Results:

  • The creation of a high-growth and high-profit strategy for Bristan Group and its four divisions, together with clear performance targets for the next five years
  • A group-wide leadership agenda with specific strategic objectives embedded into each executive’s performance contract
  • Sign-off to the strategy and associated plans by the Masco Corporation executives
  • The complete project was delivered within eight weeks

What The Clients Say:

“Stuart delivered against my high expectations. Our leadership team unanimously believe that Stuart’s involvement has been instrumental in helping us develop a set of strategies for growth that are ambitious, robust and fully-owned by each divisional executive. I would definitely recommend other leaders looking to develop compelling and robust strategies for their companies or organisations to speak to Stuart.” Jeremy Ling, CEO, The Bristan Group

“Historically, our strategies and high-level plans have been developed by a small group of directors, distant from the some elements of the business. Stuart’s integrity, openness, pragmatism and professionalism enabled us to involve over 50 senior executives and key managers in a way that has transformed their level of engagement with the company’s future strategy.  I now have real confidence that we have the strategic clarity, the specific plans and the executive ownership that will enable us to drive dramatic and sustainable growth for our business.” Lance Gillett, Chief Financial Officer, The Bristan Group

Strategy Tweets (Part III)

Friday, May 21st, 2010

I have previously shared my ongoing strategy tweets here and here, and have now reached the magic 100 insights! I will be continuing to post ideas and insights and you can follow me at https://twitter.com/stuart_cross

See below the list from 76-100, with an extra insight for free!

76. If you want your managers to own your strategy, you must involve them in developing it.

77. A great strategy has 3 elements: where you will play, how you will win, and what you’re willing to trade-off.

78. Find new growth by restating your market, eg Apple = “consumer electronic devices”, not “personal computers”.

79. Customers love companies that make them feel better about their life. How does your business achieve that?

80. Like Tour de France victors, top companies make their move on the toughest climbs, not the easy descents.

81. Set a few medium term objectives to share a consistent story, create focus and fast-track growth.

82. Can you describe your strategy in 30 seconds? If not, how do you expect others to ‘get it’?

83. Your strategy should shine a light into the future of your business. People won’t follow you into the dark.

84. “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” is the most misguided management aphorism. Be proactive, not reactive.

85. Don’t just focus on the bottom-line. Focus on the key factors that drive your ongoing profit performance.

86. Engagement follows involvement. Are your managers involved in developing the strategies they must deliver?

87. Instead of trying to second-guess market changes, focus innovation on what won’t change – e.g. speed, price.

88. We all make assumptions about how our business succeeds. But how often do you challenge them?

89. How much time do you spend to systematically making it easier for your people to achieve their goals?

90. Momentum is key to organisational confidence and belief. Don’t just protect what you’ve got; keep moving.

91. The secret to success is not to avoid failure but to fail as quickly and as cheaply as you can.

92. Large companies that are good at innovation are remarkable and few. The key is to make it your #1 priority.

93. Don’t blame your budget for inhibiting new growth. There’s always money available if the idea’s good enough.

94. Higher performance standards raise, not lower your organisation’s operational capacity.

95. Customer service can be as critical for a product company as it is for a service business.

96. Spend as much effort on the front-line observing customers as you do reading second or third hand data.

97. You can only change the world through action, not thinking. How are you taking your ideas forward?

98. Innovation is still the key driver of long-term profit growth. How high is it on your agenda?

99. The best companies are those that stay lean in the good times and still invest for growth in the bad.

100. As with your personal health, business success results from effective daily regimes, not a magic pill.

And, last but by no means least…

101. The ultimate question: does your strategy excite you? If not, you’ll never find the energy to deliver it.

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Aligning Strategy And Innovation

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

Innovation is not just about new product development. Most of the innovation literature focuses on the companies that excel in developing new game-changing products and services, but this is only one aspect of innovation.

I have written elsewhere that there are five generic business strategies, which are, in summary:

  1. Product Leader. These companies want to have the latest and best products for their target customers. Examples include Apple, Sony, Singapore Airlines, Ferrari.
  2. Cost Leader. These companies offer amazing prices to their customers. Examples include Tata Cars, Aldi, Primark.
  3. Convenience Leader. These companies offer clear standards of performance and value, deliver against them every time and are essentially hassle-free. Examples include McDonalds, Toyota, Dell, Amazon.
  4. Service Leader. These organisations attract clients as a result of their expert advice and support. Examples include John Lewis, Nordstroms, Home Depot, Lexus.
  5. Solutions Leader. These businesses tailor their offer to individual customers, creating bespoke solutions. Examples include McKinsey, IBM, Harley Davidson.

An organisation that aspires to leadership must, as a result, be innovation-led. Only then can it create clear blue water with its competitors.

But, as set out in the table below, the nature of the innovation is different. McDonalds, for example, as a Convenience Leader, doesn’t spend all of its time re-inventing the Big Mac. Instead, it finds new, more efficient and reliable ways to manage its supply chain, and improve the convenience for its customers (e.g. drive-thru’s, 24-hour restaurants).

Conversely, a product leader, such as Nike, will be relentlessly introducing new products and technologies, managing their life cycle and, as demand declines, withdrawing and replacing that particular model.

What is your strategic focus, and what does that mean for your innovation priorities?

matching-innovation-and-strategy1

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.

Stuart’s Strategy Tweets (Part 2)

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

A few weeks ago I shared my first 50 strategy tweets with you. Here are the next 25. You can follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/stuart_cross

  1. Identify the major disagreements of your team. Resolve them, don’t hide from them.
  2. Meet more regularly to drive your big ideas forward. Amazon’s leadership team meets weekly, for example.
  3. Respond to all investment requests by saying, “And how will this help us achieve our vision?”
  4. When are you really at your best? Understanding what drives your success helps you better exploit it.
  5. Make your planning future-back. To hit your 3-year goals, what must you do in 2 years, 12 months, 90 days?
  6. Just because you’re the boss doesn’t mean you’re right. How much time do you spend listening vs. telling?
  7. Selectively prune in the good times and selectively invest in the bad to avoid a ‘boom and bust’ strategy.
  8. Exploit successful rule breaking. Where are your teams winning by ignoring the rulebook?
  9. Experiment, experiment. Version #1 is bound to be wrong, so get it over with and get onto version #2, #3 and #4.
  10. Take time to dream. Many breakthrough ideas came during some downtime. Look at Archimedes and Newton.
  11. The risk with plans and targets –you might hit them. What could you achieve with a more flexible approach?
  12. What preventative and contingent actions have you set to reduce the risk of your strategy?
  13. Continue to raise the bar for your business by having goals that sit above your immediate targets.
  14. Build on your strengths. Too many companies focus on correcting weaknesses, not exploiting their advantages.
  15. Yes, you want to drive profits, but does your strategy explain how you improve the lives of your customers?
  16. First decide on your objectives, then the best route to get there. We often mix and confuse these decisions.
  17. Can your front-line colleagues articulate your strategy? If not, how can they make good decisions?
  18. If you’re clear on where your going you can usually find a way to get there. What’s your #1 objective?
  19. Separate objectives from tactics. Be fixed on the vision but flexible on the route.
  20. The #1 business success factor is agility. How quickly and how well can you exploit new opportunities?
  21. Tesco’s had the same 4 strategic goals for 10 years plus. What are the consistent themes of your strategy?
  22. What split of your time is spent on external vs. internal issues? New growth is out there, not in here.
  23. Are your managers clear on their decision rights, or is everyone stepping on each other’s toes?
  24. For every decision you make, are you clear about how it will move your business towards its strategic goals?
  25. Are there hidden capabilities in your organisation that could take you into new market opportunities?

© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.