Click on the link to read my article, The 3 Levels Of Business Agility, which has just been posted on BNET.
© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.
Click on the link to read my article, The 3 Levels Of Business Agility, which has just been posted on BNET.
© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.
How effective is your strategy? Why not take my quick strategy test, and see where your strategy management approach is working and where there is further work for you and your team to do.
Simply score yourself and your organisation from 0 to 5 for each of the statements below, where ‘0’ means you strongly disagree with the statement, and ‘5’ means you strongly agree with the statement.
After completing the survey sum up your total score and find out what it means for you and your company by comparing to the summaries below.
1. Do You Have A Compelling Strategic Intent?
2. Do You Have Clarity On Your Big Issues?
3. Do You Have A Focused Agenda For Action?
4. Do You Have An Effective Strategy Management Approach?
WHAT YOUR RESULTS MEAN
Your score is less than 40
Your company is probably struggling to make real progress in delivering a winning strategy. Your people and your stakeholders may be confused about your future direction and your key priorities, and senior managers may find it difficult to achieve alignment around decisions with a long-term impact. As a leader of the business you may find many low-level decisions are being passed up the chain for your approval and new initiatives may struggle to gain traction across the organisation. You are likely to find yourself being forced to compete on price rather than product/service quality or effective customer relationships.
Your score is in the range, 40-65
You have a reasonably effective strategy, yet you may find that you struggle to make it stick. Strategy is likely to be seen as something that is worked on once the “real” work has been done, and you may find it difficult to balance long-term goals with short-term demands. Strategic initiatives may be viewed as being distinct from business-as-usual, and you may have problems in persuading your best people to lead and drive these programmes.
Your score is more than 65
Your company is set up to develop and execute an effective strategy. You are likely to have set a clear direction, alignment around the strategy is likely to be high and your people understand their role in its delivery. The key watch-out going forward is to ensure that your strategy remains relevant in the context of fast-changing business environments. Remember, nothing fails like success, and you must ensure that you continue to be proactive in raising the bar and driving future growth.
© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.
For the past couple of months I’ve been posting strategy insights on Twitter. You can follow me at https://twitter.com/stuart_cross.
Just in case you’ve missed them, here are the first 50 insights:
© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.
Click on the link to read my article, What Market Are You Really In? , which has just been posted on BNET.
© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.
Click on the link to read my article, 7 Strategy Pitfalls, which has just been posted on BNET.
© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.
I wrote a week or so ago that Apple didn’t see itself in the computer market, but that the mobile communications market was part of its core business. Sure enough, during the launch of the iPad, Steve Jobs commented that Apple were now the world’s largest player in the mobile devices market.
One of the best ways to drive growth for your business is to have a clear view about the markets you play in. Like with Apple, these may change over time, as technology, customer behaviours and competition changes.
Kodak is struggling because, for too long, it continued to believe it was in the film processing market, not the mobile devices market. Olivetti made the mistake of believing it was in the typewriter market, not the word processing market.
If Kodak’s and Olivetti’s executives had been able to make this perceptual leap much earlier, like Steve Jobs and his team did, they would have been much better able to deal with the rapid changes that brought their companies down.
Understanding what your real markets are, requires you to answer these three questions:
As you can see, once you have answered these questions you are likely to have a very different view of your market.
To begin with, it’s likely to be much larger than you think, with more existing and potential competitors to consider. It will also be more uncertain as it requires you to anticipate future changes and dynamics.
All this will make your market more difficult to predict, messier and more difficult. At the same time, however, it will also have far bigger and more interesting possibilities and opportunities.
To my mind, this is part of Steve Jobs’s genius. He recognises markets aren’t defined by products but by customer experiences. As technologies develop and converge, customers will demand and respond to new and better experiences.
This has meant that Apple has shifted its perception of its market from the personal computer to a much bigger and dynamic market, which is now called the mobile devices market.
What market are you really in?
© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.
I was in a meeting with a strategy director yesterday, when he shared his concern that his strategy team may be missing a trick. He wanted to make sure that the processes and approaches he is currently using to develop his company’s strategy were going to take the business forward, not backwards.
So, here are my top 10 strategy pitfalls. How many of these are evident in your business?
© Stuart Cross 2010. All rights reserved.
If you think of your core business as a set of products or range of services you are making a big mistake. Products and services become obsolete over time – just ask Kodak’s camera film executives or Olivetti’s typewriter teams.
Both these companies were highly skilled at what they did, but their excessive product focus created such high levels of inertia that they were unable to change as quickly as their customers. As Seth Godin wrote earlier this week you must be willing and able to adapt to your changing markets.
Both Google and Apple are now in the smart phone business. And although this represents a big leap in terms of the products and services they offer, the smart phone sector is definitely within each company’s core business.
Apple’s core business is to provide people with the best designed computing and digital communication and entertainment products and services. Google’s core business is the sale of focused advertising services that result from on-line searches.
As the computing, mobile phone and digital electronics markets continue to converge, it makes logical sense for both companies to offer mobile phones. It helps them both drive forward their core business.
So what’s your core business? Are you like Kodak and Olivetti, and focused on a particular range of products and services? Or are you like Google and Apple, and delivering a set of customer benefits and solutions in whatever form makes most sense in your constantly evolving markets?
Can you articulate your company’s key strategic objectives? If so, do they provide clear and unequivocal guidance to you and your team about what is required to achieve success over the next few years?
Too often companies’ strategic statements are a mix of platitudes and hubris. For example, a strategic objective to deliver the ‘best customer service in the world’ is likely to receive nods of agreement from around the board table but is simply not precise enough to be delivered by the organisation.
Once you move away from platitudes to specific, measurable outcomes, you will create the focus, alignment and momentum to deliver the performance you’re after.
For example, for the last 5 years or more, Tesco has set a goal to be as big in non-food as it is in food. Delivering this goal has meant that, in some instances, more resources have been allocated to non-food teams than to the traditional food teams, which has created a stream of innovation in areas including clothing, electrical goods, retail services as well as its launch of Tesco Direct.
But clear, focused objectives are only the start. You also need to develop the commitment to pursuing and delivering a suite of initiatives that will, cumulatively, enable you to achieve your objective.
This becomes a problem when your first few initiatives do not go as planned. It can be tempting simply to give up on the goal, rather than develop new initiatives.
When I worked for UK retailer, Boots the Chemists, for example, the organisation set out a ‘wellbeing’ strategy, with a focus on added value services, such as dentistry, massage and complementary health.
The trouble started because the company over-invested in its initial initiatives, and when they didn’t work, it quickly back-tracked and gave up on the whole strategic objective, even though there were still some interesting consumer opportunities.
Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon put it like this: he said that his business is “fixed on the vision, flexible on the journey”, and that is the attitude that best leads to strategic success.
When I work with my clients I find I can increase the speed and effectiveness of the work by focusing first on the executive team’s opinions. We call these hypotheses or assumptions, but the premise is the same: if we start with an answer we usually get to a better solution faster, even if it is different to the one we started with.
The process I use is summarised in the chart, and I call it the ‘4A Framework’.
The 4A Framework

The first step is to clearly define the issue at hand, but it is the second step that is critical. Rather than seeking to ‘boil the ocean’ with analysis, you set out your initial view on the alternative solutions, and then, based on your existing knowledge of your business and your markets, take a high-level view of which alternative you believe is best.
This allows you to focus your analysis, increasing the pace and effectiveness of your decision-making.
© Stuart Cross 2009. All rights are reserved.